TEXAS CITY REFIN., INC. v. GRAND BAHAMA PET. CO., LTD.


347 A.2d 657 (1975)

TEXAS CITY REFINING, INC., Defendant below, Appellant, v. GRAND BAHAMA PETROLEUM COMPANY, LIMITED, Plaintiff below, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Decided November 10, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

S. Samuel Arsht and Martin P. Tully, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell, Wilmington, for defendant below, appellant.

Richard F. Corroon, Robert K. Payson and Michael D. Goldman, Potter Anderson & Corroon, Wilmington, for plaintiff below, appellee.

Before HERRMANN, Chief Justice, DUFFY and McNEILLY, Justices.


PER CURIAM.

The sole question before us is whether the Superior Court abused its discretion in denying defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's Delaware action on the ground of forum non conveniens or, alternatively, to stay the instant proceeding pending the outcome of a suit subsequently filed by defendant and its parent corporations in Texas. Finding no abuse of discretion, and because of the imminence of the pending...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases