Order affirmed, without costs.
Appellant claims, inter alia, that he was not advised of his right to counsel in accordance with section 433 of the Family Court Act. The record clearly establishes the contrary, however, since he was affirmatively advised of this right at a preliminary proceeding held on December 6, 1972, at which time he waived it. The colloquy in this regard was as follows: "the court: * * * Now, you have a right to be represented by an attorney...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
