OPINION
DOUGLAS, Judge.
This is an appeal from a conviction for the offense of possession of marihuana. The jury assessed punishment at ten years.
The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged.
Initially, appellant in two grounds of error contends that the trial court erred in admitting testimony concerning an extraneous offense.
The record reflects that the appellant himself conducted the cross-examination of Officer B. L. Fowler...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.