PER CURIAM.
Appellant was convicted of the crimes of breaking and entering with intent to commit a misdemeanor, to wit, petit larceny, and petit larceny. He received the maximum sentence for each offense to be served consecutively. He now appeals the denial of what he characterizes as a motion to vacate sentence under Rule 3.850, CrPR, 33 F.S.A.
In view of the fact that the petit larceny was the same offense which he intended to commit when he broke and entered...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
