STATE v. HAYES


520 P.2d 465 (1974)

STATE of Oregon, Appellant, v. Ervin E. HAYES, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 1, 1974.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas H. Denney, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Lee Johnson, Atty. Gen., and W. Michael Gillette, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Harrison M. Weatherford and Richard B. Hagedorn, Albany, argued the cause for respondent. With them on the brief were Weatherford, Thompson, Horton & Jordan, P.C., Albany.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and FORT and TANZER, JJ.


FORT, Judge.

Defendant was charged in the district court with violation of ORS 478.960.1 He demurred on the ground that the statute was void for vagueness and denied him the equal protection of the laws in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. The district court sustained the demurrer. The state appealed to the circuit court where the ruling of the district court was affirmed. The state again appeals.

The position of the state...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases