SEEK v. WINTERS

[No. 143, September Term, 1973.]

270 Md. 715 (1974)

313 A.2d 453

SEEK ET UX. v. WINTERS ET AL., SUBSTITUTED TRUSTEES

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided January 8, 1974.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert H. Reiter, with whom was Ruffin A. Brantley on the brief, for appellants.

Lance W. Billingsley, with whom were Nylen & Gilmore on the brief, for appellees.

The cause was argued before MURPHY, C.J., and BARNES, McWILLIAMS, SINGLEY, SMITH, DIGGES and LEVINE, JJ.


SMITH, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

Appellants, Robert Seek et ux. (the Seeks) here contend that a trial judge erred in directing issuance of the writ of possession against them. We conclude that he did not err.

This case is a companion to Seek v. Salladay, unreported, (No. 142, September Term, 1973, decided January 8, 1974) in that both involve the controversy between the Seeks and David Salladay and wife (the Salladays).

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases