PEOPLE v. TINSLEY


35 N.Y.2d 926 (1974)

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Raymond Tinsley, Appellant. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Kenneth Vaughan, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued December 17, 1974.

Both Decided December 20, 1974.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry W. Turkel for Raymond Tinsley, appellant.

A. Isadore Eibel for Kenneth Vaughan, appellant.

Mario Merola, District Attorney (Billie Manning of counsel), for respondent in People v. Tinsley.

Richard H. Kuh, District Attorney (Steven R. Kartagener and Lewis R. Friedman of counsel), for respondent in People v. Vaughan.

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, RABIN and STEVENS concur in Per Curiam opinion.


Per Curiam.

These are others in the list of cases in which appellate review is sought of the denial of a defendant's motion to withdraw a plea of guilty previously entered. The nature and extent of the fact-finding procedures prerequisite to the disposition of such motions rest largely in the discretion of the Judge to whom the motion is made. Only in the rare instance will a defendant be entitled to an evidentiary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases