Reversal is mandated for two reasons. Firstly, trial counsel did not adequately represent his client. The record discloses a total incapacity of counsel to properly frame questions and to develop a meaningful examination of witnesses. Summation of counsel to the jury was unintelligible and would best have remained unspoken. The case at bar does not involve errors in judgment or tactics of defense counsel (cf. People v. Tomaselli,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. ROSADO
43 A.D.2d 916 (1974)
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Raymond Rosado, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
February 7, 1974
February 7, 1974
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
