1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 205 S.E.2d
  5. 205 S.E.2d 736 (1974)
 

HOLLOMAN v. HOLLOMAN

No. 7411DC255.

205 S.E.2d 736 (1974)

22 N.C. App. 176

Arthur M. HOLLOMAN v. Lloyd E. HOLLOMAN.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Certiorari Denied September 3, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barnes & Braswell, P. A., by W. Timothy Haithcock, Goldsboro, for plaintiff appellee.

Teague, Johnson, Patterson, Dilthey & Clay by Ronald C. Dilthey, Raleigh, for defendant appellant.

Certiorari Denied by Supreme Court September 3, 1974.

BALEY, Judge.

The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying defendant's motions for a directed verdict.

When defendant moves for a directed verdict, the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff. Winters v. Burch, 284 N.C. 205, 200 S.E.2d 55<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases