1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.Y.2d
  4. 34 N.Y.2d
  5. 34 N.Y.2d 906 (1974)
 

MATTER OF ROMANCHUK v. COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER

34 N.Y.2d 906 (1974)

In the Matter of Joseph Romanchuk, Respondent, v. County of Westchester et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided June 27, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry Lott, County Attorney (Richard J. O'Keeffe, Anthony J. Caputo and Joseph J. Buderwitz, Jr. of counsel), for appellants.

Attilio J. Balletta for respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER and STEVENS. Taking no part: Judge RABIN.

Order affirmed, without costs, in the following memorandum: Mandamus, rarely, if ever, lies where relief is or has been available by way of motion or appeal in an action (CPLR 7801, subd. 1; 23 Carmody-Wait, 2d, New York Practice, § 145:99). Nevertheless, in the discretion of the Supreme Court, the remedy may be invoked if in fact no relief is currently available, official records are involved, and the interests of justice are substantially served (cf. Matter of Ihrig...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases