1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 386 F.Supp.
  5. 386 F.Supp. 546 (1974)
 

DAYCO CORPORATION v. FIRESTONE TIRE & RUBBER CO.

No. C 74-395.

386 F.Supp. 546 (1974)

DAYCO CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. The FIRESTONE TIRE & RUBBER CO., Defendant.

United States District Court, N. D. Ohio.

November 21, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edgar H. Brenner, Arnold & Porter, Washington, D. C., Robert J. Rotatori, Gold, Rotatori, Messerman & Hanna, Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Hammond E. Chaffetz, George D. Newton, Jr., Kirkland & Ellis, Chicago, Ill., Dennis M. Kelly, Cleveland, Ohio, Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue, Cleveland, Ohio, Harold L. Henderson, Akron, Ohio, for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BATTISTI, Chief Judge.

This lawsuit is filed under §§ 4 and 16 of the Clayton Act, alleging that Firestone violated the antitrust laws by attempting to monopolize the replacement tire industry. In its complaint, plaintiff lists a number of actions by Firestone which allegedly demonstrate this attempt, culminating, insofar as Dayco is concerned, with the purchase of Dayco...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases