MacCORMACK v. ROBINS

No. 2012-1.

11 Wn. App. 80 (1974)

521 P.2d 761

GEORGE MacCORMACK et al., Respondents, v. ROBINS CONSTRUCTION et al., Appellants.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

April 22, 1974.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pemberton & Bentley and Joseph T. Pemberton, for appellants.

David Y. Yamashita, Smith & St. Clair, and K.R. St. Clair, for respondents.


SWANSON, C.J.

The Whatcom County Superior Court, acting sua sponte, transformed a suit brought under the Consumer Protection Act, RCW 19.86.010, et seq., into a claim for damages based on a common-law breach of warranty theory and granted monetary relief. Defendants Robins Construction and its agent Richard Fairbanks and his wife appeal from an $11,875 judgment entered against them.1

Plaintiffs brought suit after discovering...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases