MYER v. E.M. ADAMS & CO.


519 P.2d 375 (1974)

Robert J. MYER and Maribel Myer, Respondents, Cross-Appellants, v. E.M. ADAMS & CO., an Oregon Corporation, and Donald Bruce, Appellants, Cross-Respondents, Albert L. Hawn and Richard Langton, Defendants.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided February 14, 1974.

Reargued on Rehearing January 9, 1974.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

R. Alan Wight, Portland, argued and reargued the cause for appellants, cross-respondents. On the briefs were Norman J. Wiener, J. David Petersen and Miller, Anderson, Nash, Yerke & Wiener, Portland.

Marvin S. Nepom, Portland, argued and reargued the cause for respondents, cross-appellants. With him on the briefs was Leo Levenson, Portland.


BRYSON, Justice.

Plaintiffs sued to rescind three separate stock purchases, and the trial court decreed rescission of the third purchase only. The court found that the Myers had been induced to make that purchase by defendant Bruce's representation on December 27, 1968, that the TiLINE, Inc., stock was "going to go interstate." The court further found that this representation and its innuendo as understood by the Myers were false. On appeal, this court affirmed the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases