The Trial Judge's concern with the parole of the appellant by the State Division for Youth after six months in a previous placement was obviously well founded considering the appellant's subsequent involvements with the law and the fact that he has absconded during the pendency of this appeal. Nonetheless, the State Division for Youth pursuant to subdivision 1 of section 523 of the Executive Law has the ultimate responsibility for determining a "release [parole] to be in...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.