1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 384 F.Supp.
  5. 384 F.Supp. 483 (1974)
 

UNITED STATES v. SHAFER

No. CR 74-165.

384 F.Supp. 483 (1974)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Lawrence A. SHAFER et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N. D. Ohio, E. D.

March 29, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Murphy, Paul Lawrence, John Hoyle, U. S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

Bernard Stuplinski, C. D. Lambros, Cleveland, Ohio, E. K. Wright, Dover, Ohio, Jack Schulman, Michael Diamant, Cleveland, Ohio, for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BATTISTI, Chief Judge.

Defendants, Lawrence A. Shafer, William E. Perkins, and Mathew J. McManus, have moved for an order dismissing those portions of the indictment in this case which concern them, claiming that 18 U.S.C. Section 242, upon which the indictment is based, is vague and ambiguous, thus depriving them of their Fifth Amendment due process rights. Defendants James D. McGee, James E. Pierce, Ralph W. Zoller, and Barry...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases