1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 83 Wn.2d
  5. 83 Wn.2d 782 (1974)
 

MULHOLLAND v. TACOMA

No. 42896.

83 Wn.2d 782 (1974)

522 P.2d 1157

FRED D. MULHOLLAND, JR., Respondent, v. THE CITY OF TACOMA, Appellant.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

June 6, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert R. Hamilton, City Attorney, and F.H. Chapin, Jr., Assistant, by Thomas L. Dempsey, Assistant, for appellant.

Kane, Vandeberg & Hartinger, by Harold T. Hartinger, for respondent.

BRACHTENBACH, J.

This case involves plaintiff's right to a pension from the City of Tacoma police pension fund established by RCW 41.20. The essential question is the interaction of RCW 41.20, the police relief and pensions in first class cities act, and a later law, RCW 41.26, the law enforcement officers' and fire fighters' retirement system act (LEFF).

Plaintiff served in the Tacoma police department for 24 years and 2 months. After his voluntary termination...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases