HUNT v. DelCOLLO


317 A.2d 545 (1974)

Edward L. HUNT et al., Plaintiffs, v. Michael D. DelCOLLO et al., Defendants.

Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle.

March 7, 1974.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel V. Abramo, Abramo, Hunt & Abramo, Wilmington, for plaintiffs.

William R. Hitchens, Jr., and Morris Lewis Stoltz, II, Morris, James, Hitchens & Williams, Wilmington, for defendants DelCollo, Blanchfield, Tauscher and C. Iacono Const. Co.

David Roeberg, Potter & Roeberg, Wilmington, for defendants Ferrigan.


BROWN, Vice Chancellor.

Defendants in this action have moved to dismiss under Rule 12, Del.C.Ann., on the grounds that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, and also for the additional reasons that the Court lacks jurisdiction, that Plaintiffs are guilty of laches and for failure of Plaintiffs to join an indispensable party. Defendants concede that for the purpose of their motions, the facts well pleaded by the complaint must be accepted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases