1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 519 P.2d
  5. 519 P.2d 332 (1974)
 

VIGIL v. MOTOR VEHICLE DIVISION OF DEPT. OF REVENUE

No. 26121.

519 P.2d 332 (1974)

Oney VIGIL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MOTOR VEHICLE DIVISION OF the DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE of the State of Colorado, Defendant-Appellee.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

February 11, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eugene Deikman, Denver, for plaintiff-appellant.

John P. Moore, Atty. Gen., John E. Bush, Deputy Atty. Gen., James K. Tarpey, Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, for defendant-appellee.

HODGES, Justice.

Several aspects of the implied consent law are challenged in this appeal. The implied consent law in brief states that any person who drives a motor vehicle upon the public highway is deemed to have given his consent to a chemical test to determine the alcoholic content of his blood when he is arrested on the charge of driving while under the influence of alcohol. If he refuses to take the test, the department of revenue will notify him that he must...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases