1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 63 Wis.2d
  5. 63 Wis.2d 760 (1974)
 

RINEHART v. STATE

No. State 192.

63 Wis.2d 760 (1974)

218 N.W.2d 323

RINEHART, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided June 4, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error there were briefs by Howard B. Eisenberg, state public defender, and Richard M. Sals, assistant state public defender, and oral argument by Mr. Sals.

For the defendant in error the cause was argued by Robert D. Martinson, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Robert W. Warren, attorney general.

BEILFUSS, J.

The defendant does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence nor the sentence imposed. He does present several issues that blend into two contentions: (1) The officer did not have probable cause to believe the defendant committed the crimes, and (2) that an arrest without a warrant was illegal.

"Probable cause" has been defined in many cases in this court and elsewhere. A recent definition appears in State v. Paszek (1971), ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases