Judgment affirmed.
The charges against defendant were based on evidence seized upon execution of a search warrant. As appears from the record, the application for the warrant was made orally to the court upon the return of wiretap orders. In support of the application, a police officer gave sworn testimony about conversations overheard while the wiretap orders were in effect, and the wiretap orders were received into evidence as part of the application. CPL 690.35...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
