1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 65 Wis.2d
  5. 65 Wis.2d 730 (1974)
 

BIZZLE v. STATE

No. State 106.

65 Wis.2d 730 (1974)

223 N.W.2d 577

BIZZLE, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided November 26, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The cause was submitted for the plaintiff in error on the brief of Anthony S. DeMark and Wratten, Dana & DeMark, all of Racine, and for the defendant in error on the brief of Robert W. Warren, attorney general, and David J. Becker, assistant attorney general.

Submitted under sec. (Rule) 251.54 November 1, 1974.

ROBERT W. HANSEN, J.

The sole claim of error is as to the trial court's refusal to give a requested instruction directing the jury to examine testimony given by an accomplice ". . . with the utmost care and caution . . . ."1 The trial court held that witnesses for the state, Joe Bennie King and Anthony Wooten, were not accomplices of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases