The facts are undisputed and the question to be determined is whether petitioner, a citizen taxpayer, has standing to challenge on constitutional grounds a "budget statute" which provides for payments of certain sums of money to members of the State Assembly "in lieu of expenses" (L. 1973, ch. 600, § 9). Special Term has determined he does not. We agree. Our courts have consistently held that an individual must be personally aggrieved in order to challenge a statute...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
