OPINION BY HOFFMAN, J., September 23, 1974:
Appellants contend that the lower court erred in entering a compulsory nonsuit against them for failure to prove the essential elements of duress and undue influence alleged to have been practiced by the appellee in procuring an elimination rider.
For a successive period of time beginning in 1950, the appellants, Mr. and Mrs. Loizos, were insured with the appellee, Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company, under a hospitalization...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
