SCOTT v. ANCHOR MOTOR FREIGHT, INC.

Nos. 73-1703-73-1705.

496 F.2d 276 (1974)

William SCOTT, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ANCHOR MOTOR FREIGHT, INC., Defendant-Appellant. William SCOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ANCHOR MOTOR FREIGHT, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees. William SCOTT, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION 377, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided April 30, 1974.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul H. Tobias, Cincinnati, Ohio, on brief for plaintiff-appellant ; Goldman, Cole & Putnick, Cincinnati, Ohio, Niki Z. Schwartz, Cleveland, Ohio, Thomas P. Wellman, Youngstown, Ohio, of counsel.

Bernard S. Goldfarb, Cleveland, Ohio, on brief for Anchor Motor Freight, Inc. ; Goldfarb & Reznick, Cleveland, Ohio, of counsel.

Eugene Green, Green, Schiavoni, Murphy & Haines, Youngstown, Ohio, for Teamsters Local Union No. 377.

Before CELEBREZZE, PECK and McCREE, Circuit Judges.


CELEBREZZE, Circuit Judge.

Consolidated herein are three appeals from a judgment against a company and a union. Plaintiff William Scott (Scott) sued his former employer and union representative under section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act,1 claiming that Defendant Anchor Motor Freight (Anchor) had wrongfully discharged him and that Defendant Teamsters Local 377 (Local 377) had unfairly represented him in protesting the discharge...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases