STATE v. EIDE

No. 42995.

83 Wn.2d 676 (1974)

521 P.2d 706

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, on the Relation of Carl E. Brundage, Respondent, v. DONALD A. EIDE, as Judge, et al., Appellants, THE CITY OF AUBURN, Respondent.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

April 25, 1974.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christopher T. Bayley, Prosecuting Attorney, and Richard D. Eadie, Deputy, for appellants.

David A. Leen of Legal Services Center (Seattle), for respondents.


UTTER, J.

Carl E. Brundage, defendant below, challenged the constitutionality of an order entered by Judge Donald A. Eide of Aukeen District Court. This order required him to pay the fee of an attorney appointed to defend him at the time of arraignment as an indigent defendant, if he could later do so without financial burden, within 6 months after the arraignment. A summary judgment in favor of Brundage was entered by the trial court and the state appeals.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases