PLAN FOR ARCADIA, INC. v. CITY COUNCIL OF ARCADIA

Docket No. 42560.

42 Cal.App.3d 712 (1974)

117 Cal. Rptr. 96

PLAN FOR ARCADIA, INC., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY COUNCIL OF ARCADIA, Defendant and Respondent; ANITA ASSOCIATES et al., Real Parties in Interest and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

October 28, 1974.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Young, Henrie & McCarthy, John C. McCarthy, Timothy P. Burrell and Stephan C. Volker for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

No appearance for Defendant and Respondent.

O'Melveny & Myers, Philip F. Westbrook, Jr., Richard S. Volpert, Thomas H. Childers, Francis J. Burgweger, Jr., James W. Colbert III and Barrett, Stearns Collins, Gleason & Kinney for Real Parties in Interest and Respondents.


OPINION

COLE, J.*

Plan for Arcadia, Inc., and Carl J. Williams (hereinafter "petitioners") unsuccessfully sought a writ of mandamus directed to the City Council of the City of Arcadia (hereinafter "City Council"). Anita Associates, a limited partnership, and Santa Anita Consolidated, Inc., a corporation, were named as real parties in interest (hereinafter "Santa Anita" collectively and "Anita Associates...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases