BRIGGS v. BRIGGS

No. 7426DC256.

205 S.E.2d 547 (1974)

21 N.C. App. 674

Mildred Lee BRIGGS v. William Donald BRIGGS.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

June 5, 1974.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mraz, Aycock, Casstevens & Davis by Nelson M. Casstevens, Jr., Charlotte, for plaintiff.

Richard H. Robertson, Charlotte, for defendant.


BROCK, Chief Judge.

Defendant contends the trial court erred in failing to make sufficient findings of fact to support an order for alimony pendente lite. G.S. § 50-16.8(f) provides, among other things, that when an application for alimony pendente lite is made, the trial judge shall find the facts from the evidence presented. The trial judge is not required to make findings as to each allegation and evidentiary fact presented. However, the trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases