1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 376 F.Supp.
  5. 376 F.Supp. 369 (1974)
 

SUROWITZ v. NEW YORK CITY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM

No. 73 Civ. 4430 (MP).

376 F.Supp. 369 (1974)

Anthony B. SUROWITZ, Plaintiff, v. The NEW YORK CITY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, and Arthur Van Houten, Executive Director, the New York City Employees' Retirement System, Defendants.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

May 9, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel Resnicoff, New York City, for plaintiff.

Adrian P. Burke, Corp. Counsel for City of New York, New York City, by A. Michael Weber, Asst. Corp. Counsel, New York City.

POLLACK, District Judge.

Speaking of judicial review of administrative action, Mr. Justice Brandeis once said: "The supremacy of law demands that there shall be an opportunity to have some court decide whether an erroneous rule of law was applied and whether the proceeding in which facts were adjudicated was conducted regularly." St. Joseph Stock Yards Co. v. United States, 298 U.S. 38, 84, 56 S.Ct. 720, 740, 80 L.Ed. 1033 (1936...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases