STOUT v. CRUTCHFIELD

No. 7418DC337.

204 S.E.2d 541 (1974)

21 N.C. App. 387

Henry H. STOUT and Stoco, Inc. v. William CRUTCHFIELD and Veora Crutchfield.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Certiorari Denied June 4, 1974.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dees, Johnson, Tart, Giles & Tedder, by J. Sam Johnson, Jr., Greensboro, for plaintiff appellees.

Smith, Carrington, Patterson, Follin & Curtis, by Norman B. Smith, Greensboro, for defendant appellants.


Certiorari Denied by Supreme Court June 4, 1974.

BALEY, Judge.

Defendants contend that the trial court erred in holding that they were tenants at will. They take the position that they have the right to possession of the house and lot in question by virtue of a document signed by Henry H. Stout on 9 January 1966.

William Crutchfield testified without contradiction that after Stoco purchased the property, Stout offered to sell it to defendants. Defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases