UNITED STATES v. SPRINGER

No. 73-1876.

491 F.2d 239 (1974)

UNITED STATES of America, and United States District Court for the Central District of California, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Curtis Howe SPRINGER, aka Curtis H. Springer, et al., Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied February 26, 1974.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George W. Nilsson, Los Angeles, Cal. (argued), for defendants-appellants.

William D. Keller, U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., Wallace H. Johnson, Asst. U. S. Atty., Gen., Carl Strass (argued), Edmund B. Clark, U. S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Before TRASK and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges, and THOMPSON, District Judge.


BRUCE R. THOMPSON, District Judge:

The early history of this case is related in an opinion of the District Court granting a partial summary judgment, United States v. Springer, 321 F.Supp. 625 (C.D.Cal.1970), followed by issuance of a preliminary injunction, and in an opinion of this Court affirming, United States v. Springer, 478 F.2d 43 (9th Cir. 1972). The facts as related in those opinions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases