1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 63 Wis.2d
  5. 63 Wis.2d 644 (1974)
 

STATE v. GEDKO

No. State 194.

63 Wis.2d 644 (1974)

218 N.W.2d 249

STATE, Respondent, v. GEDKO and wife, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided June 4, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Morse, Morse & Roggensack of Lancaster, and oral argument by R. R. Roggensack.

For the respondent the cause was argued by Robert D. Martinson, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Robert W. Warren, attorney general.

BEILFUSS, J.

The defendants contend that the conduct of the police in this case constituted an unlawful search in violation of the fourth amendment. The facts of this case are markedly similar to Hester v. United States (1924), 265 U.S. 57, 58, 59, 44 Sup. Ct. 445, 68 L. Ed. 898, wherein the United States Supreme Court stated:

"The witnesses whose testimony is objected to were...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases