RENZAGLIA v. CHIPMAN

No. 44147.

215 N.W.2d 477 (1974)

Donald RENZAGLIA, a Minor, By and Through His Guardian Ad Litem, Donald O. Renzaglia, and Donald O. Renzaglia, Individually, Appellants, v. Conrad CHIPMAN, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

February 22, 1974.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward J. Matonich, Hibbing, for appellants.

Applequist, Donovan, Larson, Barnes, Mathias & Magie and Robert E. Mathias, Duluth, for respondent.

Heard before KNUTSON, C. J., and PETERSON, TODD, and YETKA, JJ., and considered and decided by the court.


PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial and from a judgment entered in favor of defendant. The jury returned a verdict finding neither party negligent, and on appeal plaintiffs seek to question the limitations placed on their right to argue the effects of comparative negligence verdicts. We affirm.

Plaintiff Donald Renzaglia was a 12-year-old bicyclist who at the time of the accident giving rise to this action was riding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases