DePALMA v. CITY OF ST. PAUL

No. 44204.

215 N.W.2d 477 (1974)

Nick DePALMA, Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. PAUL, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

March 1, 1974.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Berde, Leonard & Weinblatt, and Alan W. Weinblatt, St. Paul, for appellant.

Kenneth, J. Fitzpatrick, City Atty., Daniel L. Ficker, Asst. City Atty., St. Paul, for respondent.

Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.


PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the district court awarding him $2,000 plus interest for the taking of his property by the city of St. Paul. He claims (1) that the trial judge erroneously excluded certain testimony of plaintiff, and (2) that the trial judge erroneously directed a verdict for the amount of damages. We have considered these claims and find them to be without merit.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases