PER CURIAM.
Defendant-appellant was informed against, tried non-jury, found guilty and sentenced to one year in the state penitentiary for grand larceny.
On appeal, defendant first contends that the trial judge erred in denying defense counsel's motion to dismiss or to exclude certain testimony based upon the grounds of double jeopardy and collateral estoppel.
An examination of the record on appeal clearly reflects that the case sub judice is not barred...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
