In a well-articulated petition in pro. per., Lee Roger Duran meritoriously seeks habeas corpus on the grounds his probation was revoked for no good reason, and in violation of the notice requirements of Morrissey v. Brewer,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
IN RE DURAN
38 Cal.App.3d 632 (1974)
113 Cal. Rptr. 442
In re LEE ROGER DURAN on Habeas Corpus.
Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
April 15, 1974.
April 15, 1974.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Lee Roger Duran, in pro. per., and Paul Bell, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Petitioner.
Evelle J. Younger, Attorney General, Jack R. Winkler, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Daniel J. Kremer, Assistant Attorney General, Harley D. Mayfield and Bernard A. Delaney, Jr., Deputy Attorneys General, for Respondent.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.