DAVIS v. PITCHESS

No. 74-1809.

518 F.2d 141 (1974)

Charles Edward DAVIS, Petitioner, Appellee, v. Peter J. PITCHESS, Sheriff of Los Angeles County, Respondent, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

December 9, 1974.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Shunji Asari, Deputy Atty. Gen. (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent, appellant.

Richard Wasserstrom (argued), Santa Monica, Cal., for petitioner, appellee.

Before CHAMBERS and ELY, Circuit Judges, and BALDWIN Customs and Patent Judge.


OPINION

PER CURIAM:

The District Court originally granted a conditional writ of habeas corpus, having found that Davis had been deprived of a fair trial by the failure of the prosecution to disclose a laboratory report containing potentially exculpatory evidence. After this Court affirmed that decision in an unreported opinion, the State commenced preparation for a retrial. It was then discovered that certain physical evidence which was the subject of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases