Vernon K. CHARVAT, Appellant,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued October 26, 1972.
Decided June 28, 1974.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Armand P. Boisselle, Jr., Spartanburg, S.C., with whom Donald D. Jeffery, Cleveland, Ohio, was on the brief, for appellant.
Fred W. Sherling, Associate Sol., U.S. Patent Office, with whom S. William Cochran, Sol., U.S. Patent Office, was on the brief, for appellee.
Before DANAHER, Senior Circuit Judge, and MacKINNON and ROBB, Circuit Judges.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Like others1 before him who have presented an issue as to obviousness in patent litigation, Charvat has here contended that there was error in the rejection of his application Serial No. 304002 for a grinding wheel. The Patent Office and the District Court concluded that Charvat's Ramron wheel would have been obvious to one possessed if ordinary skill in the art in light of a single...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
