1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.Super.
  4. 230 Pa.Super.
  5. 230 Pa.Super. 411 (1974)
 

COMMONWEALTH v. SCHORK

230 Pa.Super. 411 (1974)

Commonwealth v. Schork, Appellant.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

September 23, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joel Every, Carl T. Bogus, and Steinberg, Greenstein, Richman & Price, for appellant.

Douglas B. Richardson, Mark Sendrow, David Richman, and Steven H. Goldblatt, Assistant District Attorneys, Abraham J. Gafni, Deputy District Attorney, Richard A. Sprague, First Assistant District Attorney, and F. Emmett Fitzpatrick, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before WATKINS, P.J., JACOBS, HOFFMAN, CERCONE, PRICE, VAN DER VOORT, and SPAETH, JJ.

OPINION BY VAN der VOORT, J., September 23, 1974:

In the above captioned case, the appellant pleaded guilty to various charges; the guilty pleas were entered prior to January 24, 1974. The appellant claims that the decision in Commonwealth v. Ingram, 455 Pa. 198, 316 A.2d 77 (1974) (decided January 24, 1974), should be applied to his appeals. In Ingram, as more fully discussed, infra, our Supreme Court dealt with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases