MARTIN, Judge.
The defendant argues on appeal that the trial court erred in finding that the plaintiff was entitled to alimony pendente lite under G.S. § 50-16.3 and counsel fees under G.S. § 50-16.4. In the alternative, defendant argues that the terms of the trial court's award exceeded its discretion.
It appears from the court's order that the defendant is required to pay $25.00 per week for the support of a child who was not eighteen years...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
