SCENIC HUDSON PRESERVATION CONFERENCE et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants-Appellees,
v.
Howard H. CALLAWAY, Individually and as Secretary of the Army, Department of Defense, et al., Defendants-Appellees, and
Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Defendant-Appellant.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued May 31, 1974.
Decided June 11, 1974.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
G. S. Peter Bergen, New York City (LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby & MacRae, Carl D. Hobelman, Andrew Gansberg, New York City, on the brief), for Consolidated Edison.
Albert K. Butzel and David Sive, New York City (Berle, Butzel & Kass, Winer, Neuburger & Sive, Angus Macbeth, New York City, on the brief), for Scenic Hudson and others.
T. Gorman Reilly, Asst. U. S. Atty. (Paul J. Curran, U. S. Atty., S. D. N. Y., Anne Sidamon-Eristoff and Gerald A. Rosenberg, Asst. U. S. Attys., on the brief), for defendants-appellees.
Before MOORE, FRIENDLY and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
In this fourth appeal to this court involving the challenged Storm King Project, a hydroelectric facility slated to be built on the west bank of the Hudson River,1 defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. ("Con Ed") appeals from a portion of a final judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Morris E. Lasker, J. Plaintiffs (collectively "Scenic...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.