1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 65 N.J.
  5. 65 N.J. 548 (1974)
 

IN RE SABATINO

65 N.J. 548 (1974)

324 A.2d 20

IN THE MATTER OF ARTHUR SABATINO, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided July 30, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Robert T. Hueston argued the cause for the Union County Ethics Committee.

Mr. Robert I. Ansell argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Anschelewitz, Barr, Ansell & Bonello, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary case grows out of an alleged conspiracy to bribe public officials of Jackson Township. It has this factual background:

In 1970, Doral Construction Company, the principals of which were Frank Vogel, Murray Eisdorfer and Morris Rattner, owned a senior citizens apartment complex in Jackson Township which had been constructed under a use variance grant that restricted occupancy to persons over 62 years of age.

Apparently there...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases