1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 509 F.2d
  5. 509 F.2d 101 (1974)
 

TURCHIO v. D/S A/S DEN NORSKE AFRICA

Nos. 152 and 40, Docket 73-1867 and 73-2058.

509 F.2d 101 (1974)

Cateno TURCHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. D/S A/S DEN NORSKE AFRICA et al., Defendants and Third Party Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants, v. PITTSTON STEVEDORING CORPORATION, Third Party Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided December 27, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas F. Molanphy, New York City (William P. Kain, Jr., Haight, Gardner, Poor & Havens, New York City, of counsel), for defendants and third party plaintiffs-appellees-cross-appellants.

Joseph Arthur Cohen, New York City (Sidney A. Schwartz, Alexander, Ash, Schwartz & Cohen, New York City, of counsel), for third party defendant-appellant.

Martin Lassoff, New York City (Morris Cizner, Zimmerman & Zimmerman, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellee.

Before SMITH, HAYS and MANSFIELD, Circuit Judges.

MANSFIELD, Circuit Judge:

Inconsistencies between a jury's verdict and its answers to interrogatories are not an infrequent occurrence. See, e. g., McCandless v. L. G. DeFelice & Son, 144 F.Supp. 462 (W.D.Pa.1956); Fuselier v. Thompson, 155 F.Supp. 75 (W.D.La.1957). In this typical tripartite longshoreman personal injury suit against a shipowner, which in turn impleaded plaintiff's employer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases