1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 206 S.E.2d
  5. 206 S.E.2d 387 (1974)
 

STATE v. RICHARDSON

No. 7426SC537.

206 S.E.2d 387 (1974)

22 N.C. App. 355

STATE of North Carolina v. William Henry RICHARDSON and Charles Edward Reeder.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

July 3, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Robert Morgan by Asst. Atty. Gen. Roy A. Giles, Jr., Raleigh, for the State.

Plumides, Plumides & Shuster by John G. Plumides, Charlotte, for defendant appellant Richardson.

Robert F. Rush, Charlotte, for defendant appellant Reeder.

MORRIS, Judge.

We cannot sustain defendants' assignment of error to the court's allowing the solicitor to question defendant Richardson concerning past criminal offenses. It is an elementary principle of evidence in North Carolina that an objection to a specific question must be made as soon as the question is asked and before the witness has time to answer. Stansbury, N.C.Evidence, Brandis Revision, Witnesses, § 27. An objection following the answer of a witness...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases