OBST v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO.


127 N.J. Super. 458 (1974)

317 A.2d 759

MARY R. OBST, PLAINTIFF, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND BOARD, AND RAY J. MARINI, DIRECTOR OF THE DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Submitted for Determination March 18, 1974.

Decided April 3, 1974.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

No one argued the cause on behalf of appellants (Messrs. Shapiro, Brotman, Eisenstadt & Capizola, attorneys; Mr. Michael D. Capizola, on the brief).

Mr. William R. Powers, Jr., argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Moss & Powell, attorneys).

Before Judges COLLESTER, LYNCH and MICHELS.


PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Chancery Division is affirmed essentially for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Bischoff.

However, we deem it appropriate to point out that with respect to the holding of the court below, that plaintiff is left to pursue her rights against the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Board, plaintiff is a "qualified person" within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 39:6-62. The term "qualified person" is defined by N.J...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases