The evidence adduced at the trial proved beyond any doubt that the defendant was guilty of robbery and burglary. The proof was so substantial that the appellant does not challenge it on this appeal and neither does the dissent. However, the question of a possible invasion of the attorney-client privilege and its possible prejudicial effect upon the jury is raised. The defendant having altered the defense course during the trial from alibi to refusal to participate in the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
