1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 392 F.Supp.
  5. 392 F.Supp. 183 (1974)
 

UNITED STATES v. MUNOZ

Crim. No. 4-82688.

392 F.Supp. 183 (1974)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Frank MUNOZ, Defendant.

United States District Court, E. D. Michigan, S. D.

September 18, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael D. Gladstone, Asst. U. S. Atty., Detroit, Mich., for plaintiff.

Neil H. Fink, Detroit, Mich., for defendant.

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO QUASH INDICTMENT

KAESS, Chief District Judge.

There is presently before the Court a Motion to Quash Indictment. The basic premise underlying the motion relates to the language of the statute under which the defendant was indicted. Section 1001, Title 18, United States Code, provides:

"Whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly and willfully falsifies...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases