BOWSER v. EVANS PRODUCT COMPANY


530 P.2d 44 (1974)

In the matter of the Compensation of William R. BOWSER, Claimant. William R. Bowser, Claimant, Petitioner, v. EVANS PRODUCT COMPANY, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided December 31, 1974.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Allan H. Coons, Eugene, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Coons, Malagon & Cole, Eugene.

Richard W. Butler, Eugene, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Thwing, Atherly & Butler, Eugene.

Before O'CONNELL, C.J., and McALLISTER, HOLMAN, TONGUE, HOWELL, BRYSON and SLOPER, JJ.


TONGUE, Justice.

This is a workmen's compensation case. Claimant contends (1) that he is entitled to reopen his claim on the basis of aggravation of a 1966 injury, for which he received a previous award for temporary total disability, and (2) that regardless of whether he may reopen for aggravation, he is entitled to medical services for conditions resulting from his previous injury.

The Court of Appeals denied both claims. 17 Or.App. 542,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases