1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 375 F.Supp.
  5. 375 F.Supp. 195 (1974)
 

THOMPSON v. KEESEE

No. 1555.

375 F.Supp. 195 (1974)

Jack THOMPSON and Judy Thompson, on behalf of themselves and all other persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Charles KEESEE, Sheriff, Pike County, Kentucky, as representative of a class, and the B. & L. Maytag Company, of Pikeville, Kentucky, Defendants.

United States District Court, E. D. Kentucky, Pikeville Division.

May 7, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bertram Ervin Brown, II, John M. Rosenberg, Kent Hull, Prestonsburg, Ky., for plaintiffs.

R. Roland Case, Kelsey E. Friend Law Firm, Pikeville, Ky., for defendants.

Before LIVELY, Circuit Judge, MOYNAHAN, Chief District Judge, and HERMANSDORFER, District Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Four specific provisions of the Kentucky Revised Statutes (KRS) touching upon creditors' rights are challenged in this proceeding: KRS 425.120, 355.9-503, 355.9-504(1) and 355.9-505(2). We find that the attack upon KRS 425.120 is well made but that this three judge court lacks jurisdiction to consider the argument of invalidity as to the provision of Kentucky's Uniform Commercial Code enactments.

The facts are simple and undisputed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases