HERBSTMAN v. EASTMAN KODAK CO.


131 N.J. Super. 439 (1974)

330 A.2d 384

CLIFFORD N. HERBSTMAN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 18, 1974.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Clifford N. Herbstman, appellant, pro se.

Messrs. Large, Scammell & Danziger, attorneys for respondent.

Before Judges CARTON, CRANE and KOLE.


The opinion of the court was delivered by CARTON, P.J.A.D.

Plaintiff brought this action against defendant manufacturer for breach of a warrant of merchantability of a new camera which he had purchased and claimed to be defective. The trial judge, after a trial in which the salient facts were substantially undisputed, dismissed the complaint on condition that defendant make the necessary repairs or replace the camera with a new one. He ordered that on failure to comply...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases