PANTANO v. PANTANO

No. 1 CA-CIV 2469.

21 Ariz. App. 541 (1974)

521 P.2d 640

Leonard PANTANO, Appellant, v. Barbara PANTANO, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1.

April 30, 1974.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roe & McDonough by Fenton J. McDonough, Scottsdale, for appellant.

Meadow, Cheche, Nastro & Thrasher by Pasquale R. Cheche, Phoenix, for appellee.


OPINION

KRUCKER, Judge.

This appeal challenges certain portions of a divorce decree. The notice of appeal filed below specified three paragraphs of the decree as being subject of this appeal. Appellant, however, has attempted on appeal to challenge another provision of the decree which was not specified in the notice of appeal and has presented no argument with respect to a portion specified in the notice of appeal. We therefore will confine our review to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases